__
BEDSIDEMANNER.INFO
BECAUSE PATIENTS JUDGE YOUR SKILLS BY YOUR BEDSIDE MANNER
_
 
(2020/02/03)
 
The informed consent is a matter of professional necessity and offers the best way to communicate with your patients in a manner that helps prevent lawsuits and defend against them if you end up in court.
 
A common problem with informed consents that leads to the courtroom relates to making light of, or neglecting to mention, the potential for complications. When there is a good chance the patient will miss several weeks of work after a procedure, you have an obligation to mention the possibility to the patient. Most everyone I know would be rather perturbed to have an unexpectedly long recovery. It always pays to make the case for more difficulty than less.
 
It is common for doctors to downplay expected postoperative sequelae in order to sell the case. I suspect there are many people out there who might reconsider elective plastic surgery if they knew how difficult some of the healing might actually be for them.

It is your job to educate the patient and give them a realistic understanding of the procedures. Explain things clearly and use terms that are understandable. Try to present your explanations with the proper balance between what is expected and what could go wrong. You must warn the patient about the very worst-case scenario without scaring them away from the preferred treatment:

  • Begin by explaining that the procedure is not usually a worrisome event if that is the case.
  • With risky procedures that have many problems associated with them, be forthright.
  • Explain any and all adverse possibilities that could occur. Even if the occurrence is one in a thousand, the complication is one hundred percent when it happens to your patient.

Here is an example of a thorough explanation with an element of humor. It can help you formulate a script for all of the procedures you perform:

DOCTOR

“Root canal therapy is not usually a big deal. As a matter of fact most of my patients tell me it’s the greatest thing they ever experienced.”

Pause:

The patient will usually smile, laugh, or make comment. You smile back and continue.

DOCTOR

“Of course I’m just kidding. The reality is that you could have some discomfort or pain afterward and this is completely normal. A small percent of the cases could experience pain for a few days. It’s usually handled well with some Tylenol or Advil and it settles down. In rare cases you could have a flare-up, whereby you have pain and swelling that could get so bad you’d want the tooth pulled.

This is rare and almost never happens.”

If this patient has a severe flare-up, they have been forewarned and are less likely to assume the practitioner did something wrong.

I saw a minor male patient for a postoperative complication of pain and swelling. As soon as I entered the room, the mother was on attack mode. “In all my experience with root canals, I never saw anything like this,” she asserted. I asked her, “How much is all your experience?” She told me that she had two root canals. I almost laughed, but refrained and just let a friendly smile show. “It’s interesting that in all your experience you may not have seen anything like this, but I’ve treated around a thousand cases each year for the past thirty years, and I’ve seen this a few times.”

I looked into my notes and saw the specific entry warning the possibility of a flare-up notated because this particular case was the type that has an increased chance of complications. I looked up from the chart and said, “Mrs. Smith, I see a note here that indicates we discussed the possibility that this tooth could flare-up. Do you remember that discussion?” She went on to apologize for attacking me, and I told her I’m sure I’d react the same way (you have to lie sometimes). I, again, explained how the dormant infection could act up, that the antibiotic wasn’t doing the trick, that we would increase the dose, and, if necessary, switch to something stronger. I took all the time necessary to explain and answer the mother’s questions while knowing the next patient was probably getting annoyed waiting for me as I went further behind schedule. That’s bedside manner. That’s avoiding lawsuits when things go wrong.

Even the best-loved doctor may get sued if the damages are large enough. A death after a routine procedure will surely see some legal discovery to determine if the doctor could be at fault. By arming yourself with all the proper documentation, and by being there for the patient and family in times of trouble, you provide the comfort your patients deserve, and keep yourself safe.


Comments
• Jane Shin (2020/02/04 18:41)
In addition to warning about complications and setting expectations, the informed consent is a great time for reviewing the treatment and explaining the process with the patient. For successful outcomes, it is important that the patient be a partner in the care, so knowing what is normal after the appointment and what is considered a flare-up will help patients tell you when something is truly wrong. The treatment has the best chance for success when the patient understands why they should be careful with chewing even after the root canal therapy is completed, and the importance of oral hygiene to keep the tooth healthy and prevent future problems.
• Shane Curtis (2020/02/04 13:52)
This post makes me think of the common phrase, \"under promise and over deliver\". The way people experience an event, or procedure, is largely shaped by their initial expectations. I see this idea in myself when I go to a restaurant. When the hostess suggests a 45 minute wait time and they call my name after 30 minutes, I am pleasantly surprised. Am I really happy to have wasted 30 minutes just to get a table? Probably not. But because I was prepared to wait 45 minutes, the 30 minutes feels like a lucky break. I think the same logic can be applied to medical/dental procedures. If a patient agrees to a procedure that is presented as requiring 5 days recovery, they will likely feel relieved when they can return to normal activity after 3 days. They may even recommend you to friends since you did such a great job that they were back to normal in only 3 days!
• Andrew Vo (2020/02/04 08:22)
I struggle with the presentation of informed consent due to the reasons mentioned. Many of the patients seen by the endodontist are already fearful and seem to be in constant battle between the desire to save their tooth and to undergo the dreaded root canal. I would like to further discuss ways to present other complications such as fractured teeth, instrument separation, and others.
• Jennifer Schlesinger (2020/02/04 08:17)
This is very well explained for us to understand the importance of informed consent. I often wonder if my patients forget what we\\\'ve discussed as soon as the finish signing for the consent. I like your joke/fact about \\\"I\\\'ve done thousands of these for 30 years.\\\" That\\\'s pretty effective.

Add comment
 
 
 
CAPTCHA Image
 
 
 
 
 
Content copyright 2009-2014. Primary Productions. All rights reserved.